What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

In this work of art, there is a boat passing under a bridge over a body of water. The setting seems to be taking place in Venice, Italy. The story depicted regards the subtle coloration and shifting effects of light on the city’s iconic and imperiled waterways.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

I notice the use of various watercolors, depicting a Venetian canal and the shifting interest of the artist from flickering lights of Impressionism to Post-Impressionism.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

This object compares to the pictures of Venice I see in real life along with the ideas of water applications into art.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

The museum chose to incorporate this piece of art within the blue section full of artworks depicting the presence of water.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

The painting is less of a story and more of way to showcase a specific form of art to create waves.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

We belive that the waves look more glossy and rough compared to other paintings we looked at and this looked more real. At first we thought the jagged edges were to signify mountains but the foam and sky soon made us realize that this was untrue.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

Well in previous paintings, we saw waves and such as much more calmer, not so jagged and strong. And they never really were meant to be the focal point of the painting but instead an background meant to accentuate something else or other.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

They chose to make it one of the first paintings visitors see when the enter the room.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

X

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

The fourth floor was closed to us today. Through a small window in the staircase, though, we were allowed a glimpse into the gallery, containing religious artwork as well as modern reinterpretations of renaissance pieces.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

Although we were only allowed a glimpse into the gallery through the door, different windows and angles of approach allowed different views into multiple pieces. A multimedia exhibition became a single piece as our observation and perspective of it was restricted.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

Compared to other objects in the museum, crowded with descriptive plaques and information to be gained about each peace, this pushed us individually to employ our more limited perspectives to not only physically perceive the art but also to interpret it.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

We can't speak on why that particular floor was closed to us, but the unique circumstances led to a special method of interpreting the pieces we saw.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

In this piece, I see an ancient Egyptian pharaoh being depicted in a position of reverence and respect. He is sitting up straight, in a very idealistic style, with a benevolent and wise expression. Both the seated pose and the pharaoh's outfit are traditional, according to the plaque, but the expressiveness of the subject's face was at the time a recent development.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

The artwork is depicted in an extremely idealistic style. Ancient Egyptians idolized their leaders, whose power was affirmed through the gods. The pharaohs were practically gods unto themselves and had to be depicted as such, with no faults or imperfections. The material used is granite, and the minor details and embellishments stand out against the darker material, creating a contrast of light against dark so that they can be easily noticed. There are also tiny hieroglyphics etched onto the sides of the throne, which could be either prayer or praise. This helps me to understand the purpose and intent behind creating such a statue.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

I am taking core art history, and a lot of the features of the ancient Egyptian artwork are things we have recently finished learning about in class. The composition, poses, appearance, and materials etc are all familiar and relevant concepts, and that background knowledge helps me better understand why these artifacts were created. Art in ancient Egypt was not usually created for pleasure or enjoyment. Rather, artists were trained from a young age to create art as forms of worship. This statue reminds me of how artists used their talent to glorify their leaders and culture, preserving their values for us to analyze millennia later

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

The museum chose to display it in a room with warm, low lights so that the colour of the materials used would stand out, and that the small details and engravings on the statue would be illuminated and not hidden in shadow. It is not covered in a glass case like some of the other statues that are made of calcite, probably because those materials are more fragile and vulnerable to erosion and are just more sensitive in general.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

The painting depicts the view of New York during the early to mid 1800s from the Narrows between Brooklyn and Staten Island. This painting focused on the idea of arrivals of different groups and peoples into New York and the feeling new arrivals feel as they reach New York.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

The painting uses various warm tones to depict a dusk-like period in the day, using white lines to show waves flowing in the water. The boats was tinted orange, showing this does of dusk as they travel through the Narrows. There are various boats making their way through the Narrows, as they approach New York City. The clouds are also shaded and flowing in a way that shows absence of wind blowing through the Narrows.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

The painting shows the experiencing of arriving to New York, showing a unique and interesting perspective on the feeling of arriving to new places. May of the other objects and paintings show different perspectives and ideas on what New York is and how it feels, and this painting definitely shows the idea of bringing fresh eyes to New York.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

The museum like put this paining in its specific location to depict this idea of coming into New York for the first time. It was put there because it connected to New York, and by standing at the beginning of the New York Displays.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

This painting is definitely larger than the other paintings and it also feels more 3D than the others.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

We see three Black women with braided hair that intertwine with each other. It forms a bond between each woman depicting a sort of sisterhood. The story seems to align with one of empowerment, as the women embrace their hair, bodies, and culture. There are also leaves and roses which could symbolize nature and tells the story of embracing one’s natural features.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

The sculpture is crafted using some sort of black marble, which stands in constant with the typical white marble and faces seen in sculpture.

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

Not many art pieces, let alone sculptures, are made depicting Black bodies and faces. The cutoff at the chest also helps in highlighting the features that are most looked down upon in society: Black hair and faces. It doesn’t show the entire body like many White sculptures do. We also found a comparison between the Egyptian statues seen in the 3rd floor. These sculptures cover the face with a mask, whereas Wiley aims to embrace the natural face.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

It’s placed in the center right at the start of the room putting it on full display—it calls the attention of any viewer. Not to mention, this shows how the faces aren’t being hidden away in some corner and are instead bold and present. The piece was also placed among other works of Wiley which focus on Black empowerment and faces.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

We see the story of the expansion of the city for better and for worse. The factories and smokestacks are representative of the economic growth, but at the same time pollute the East River.

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

The factories and the water blend together in strong hues of gray. The forefront of the painting is not the focus but the farther shore. The sky and water have taken on the same smoky hue. The division between them is what has made them that way.

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

This represents perhaps the rock-bottom form of what used to be a source of life for indigenous people. In conversation with the other paintings of rivers and bodies of water, a tragic story of violence and colonialism is told.

What do you see going on in this work of art? Is there a story depicted?

It’s a white chair, and the light hitting it offers many different ways of looking at the depth and contrast. The shadows represent a sense of loneliness, because you are providing your own chair. It’s showing a lack of community and neighborhood

What different visual elements (ie: line, color, light, proportions, scale, composition, media type etc.) do you notice, and how do they help you make sense of the artwork?

It’s made of hard plastic, which is white in this case, but there are so many other shapes and sizes and colors

How does this object compare to other objects, stories, or ideas you already know about?

It’s unique and abstract. It’s very open to interpretation by the viewer

What choices do you think the museum made about the object’s display?

The fact that they hung it on the wall instead of having it opened on the chair. Shoes the ability to change it’s functionality within a space